Village of East Aurora
REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN NOTES
Plan Prepared by Wendel Duchscherer Architects & Engineers
Goals and Objectives
- Preserve traditional neighborhood character of the Village
- Properly manage future growth and development
- Encourage investment and economic development
- Provide a safe and efficient transportation network
Expanded EA Goals & Objectives
- recognize that the unique character of the Village is an important asset to
the region that should be supported and preserved
- promote streetscape and roadway improvements to further enhance the aesthetics
and pedestrian-oriented character of the business district
- provide adequate, safe parking in and around the central business district
- provide sidewalks and pathway connections to and between parks and community
facilities, including the High School
- properly plan for the additional traffic from the Knox State Park and the
growth of the Village as a cultural hub to minimize impacts to the Village
Most recent efforts for region (in terms of any type of comprehensive
plan or study):
- Aurora, Wales and EA had Comprehensive Plans prepared under the Urban Planning
Assistance Program of the US Dept. of Housing and Urban Development (prepared
in 1970 but never adopted in Wales and EA) (Aurora - prepared in 1980-Basic
Studies, and 1981-Comp Plan and Implementation Plan).
Existing Conditions in Communities
- Elma, EA and Aurora would be considered second ring suburban communities
(transition between first ring of suburbs and rural), and Wales and Holland
rural communities.
- Village is "close to being fully developed"
Summarized Needs/Desires of East Aurora
- improve traffic and circulation problems in areas within Village
- maintain village as a desirable place to live, work and shop
- the appearance (aesthetics) of Village must be preserved and protected
- pedestrian and bicycle access throughout village is very important
- protect, promote and revitalize uptown Main Street business district.
Zoning Issues in Communities
- EA: use creative zoning techniques to control redevelopment and changes in the
community. Recent discussions and actions would indicate that the Village
prefers smaller, architecturally acceptable business uses in most of the
community. Traffic problems are problematic during peak hour travel periods
that bring a lot of pass through traffic to the area, also seasonal in nature,
with higher volumes experienced during the summer months.
Preserving Community Character: EA Recommendations
- promote walking and preservation of the pedestrian friendly atmosphere
throughout the Village. Issue is closely linked with the community character of
the Village.
- adopt architectural design standards and historic preservation standards, make
sure development or redevelopment is designed in harmony with character of
community.
- adopt landscaping standards to help improve the look and quality of commercial
and industrial development and redevelopment in village. These standards should
be referenced in the zoning text, and apply to all commercial and industrial
development requiring village approvals.
- develop community gateways at the major entryways to the Village (see vision
plan and streetscape plan)
- manage growth and properly plan highway projects to avoid roadway widening
that could result in loss of street trees and roadside foliage.
- properly manage tourism to aid the local economy but at the same time preserve
the character of the Village as a community. Focus tourism in cultural
center/business support area. Plan for possible needs of a new public parking
facility.
- with Rte 20A improvement project (working with NYSDOT), project must
accommodate bicycle and pedestrian access to the maximum extent possible. Also
consider parking needs of the area, and the need for a downtown pace of
traffic. Village should complement this plan by ensuring that proper pedestrian
and bicycle access points from the surrounding neighborhoods tie into Main St
and its improvements.
- investigate management access issues in the downtown (West End) business
district. Traffic circle represents an excellent means of traffic calming and
this combined with a good access management plan will help to properly manage
traffic.
- road widening or by-pass projects should not be considered to solve traffic
congestion problems, because they would create too many other problems
- preserve and diversify housing stock and control amount of multi-family
housing that is development in village to maintain the quality of the urban
environment.
- strive to maintain a mix of uses in the business district areas to contribute
to the prosperity and social and economic environment of the area. However,
uses permitted in these areas should be evaluated to avoid creating a
competitive atmosphere between the Uptown and Downtown retail areas in the
Village.
- implement streetscape improvements along Main St. in the business district
(see streetscape plan) to improve the aesthetic quality of the area and enhance
the social interaction in this area (continue the enforcement of the Tree
Preservation Law in the Mid-Main area and consider expanding to other areas).
Management of Future Growth and Development: EA Recommendations
- examine the business district to amend the code to match the established
vision.
* In Uptown/traditional Main St area, redevelopment of existing
structures with minimal demolition should be stressed.
* In cultural center/business support area (centered around Roycroft
campus), building design & appearance should complement, not match,
Roycroft elements.
* In Village commercial support area (transition between
cultural/business support area and downtown/west end business district), this
mixed-use area should provide connectivity to the surrounding areas and the
Village. Architecture, parking lots, signage should be consistent with Village
character and atmosphere.
* In downtown district, regulations should guide new development and
redevelopment to ensure development in this area is compatible with the
character of the Village and surrounding area. See that commercial and retail
uses in this area are balanced with the Uptown district to avoid competition,
and adverse impacts (such as traffic) are adequately assessed.
- all districts along Main St must address the streetscape issues shown in
Village's streetscape plan.
- overlay zoning districts could also be created for these districts to add
another dimension of requirements for each specific area.
- work closely with NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation in
determining the final usage of the property and site access, and potential
traffic patterns
- gateways to the village should be created at the major entrances to the
village
- full traffic study and parking/circulation plan will be needed to evaluate
conditions within the entire village and where improvements could be made
- additional parking will most probably be needed in the "Cultural
Center/Business Support District" and "Uptown/Traditional Main St. Business
District." Continue investigations into locating an area for a parking lot
(possible area around railroad tracks to service both areas).
- continue to work with NYSDOT on Main St reconstruction project.
- walkability of Central Business District and its connections to surrounding
residential areas needs to be a high priority. Traffic from within the village
should be minimized.
- do not focus just on tourism for "Cultural Center/Business Support District"
area. It should also continue to support local needs. Small area should be set
aside for overnight accommodations. Presently the village has a proposal for a
hotel, if it is approved, the village should limit the location of additional
hotels/motels. Could also target bed and breakfast facilities.
- as Commerce Green continues to fill, cooperative efforts with the town should
be explored to expand this area into the town.
- traffic circle should be kept and improved upon
- a bypass for traffic could be harmful to the businesses. Making Rte 20A/Rte
400 a full-service interchange would reduce some traffic, including trucks,
from this area. But fears that this would cause development pressure in Aurora
and Wales. Plan recommends long-term objective be that the interchange be made
full access.
- multi-family, senior type housing is needed within the Village and should be
considered for the Buffalo St. and Main St. areas. Use of in-law apartments and
other multi-use options within existing structures.
Economic Development: EA Recommendations
- preserve differentiation between distinct areas in Village Main Street
business district.
- encourage reuse of structures in eastern end of Village. Businesses should
consider adjusting their business operations to take advantage of tourism
market (i.e. adjusting hours of operation)
- new structures along Uptown Main St should be compatible with existing
businesses in size, scale and setback.
- big box development is not appropriate for west end of Main, and new
development must be consistent in size and scale with surrounding uses; subject
to careful site review, examining issues like parking, accommodation of
pedestrians and siting of buildings to minimize car-pedestrian conflicts and
traffic impacts.
- discourage new businesses in West End that would compete with Uptown Main St
smaller businesses. Most likely location for large retail centers would be
outside village limits along Olean Rd (Rte 16) and possibly Rte 20A
- work with Aurora to ensure that development outside village does not undermine
redevelopment efforts in village; need to work together because village is a
part of the town and contributes to its tax base.
- a certain level of congestion is a sign of a healthy retail district. Projects
and policies designed to encourage walking and biking in the village will help
alleviate traffic congestion and parking problems. Village has opportunity to
address this issue with proposed streetscape improvements accompanying the
upcoming NY State Department Of Transportation Main St Reconstruction project.
- transportation studies for traffic circle and west end of 20A to look at
traffic patterns, turning motions and possible solutions.
- follow streetscape plan to greatest degree feasible. Project will help
mitigate traffic conditions, support economy and tourism development in village
- don't let tourism grow to a capacity that the village cannot support or
sustain
- economic efforts within village should target retail and commercial
development. Industrial development efforts should focus primarily on success
and potential expansion of existing industries in village such as Fisher Price,
Commerce Green. For older industrial sites, it may be difficult to find new
industrial users when existing tenants vacate buildings. In many cases,
redevelopment to non-industrial use may be a preferred option, particularly in
areas close to the retail core.
Recreational Opportunities: Aurora and East Aurora Recommendations
- (problems with capacity, especially Hamlin Park and Town Pool; demand for more
sports facilities) (maintain Majors property for passive recreation)
- prepare an Open Space/Recreation plan to identify appropriate lands for future
recreational use and/or environmental conservation; address demographic trends
to accommodate needs of residents (youth and elderly)
- demand for a more extensive trail system; connect population centers of
Village with outlying facilities (High School); improve utility easements and
roadway shoulders in Village to enhance opportunities for hiking and biking.
- examine recreational needs and facilities for youth particularly in West Falls
- cooperate with School District; encourage School District to evaluate
potential for developing recreational facilities on vacant property adjacent to
Parkdale Elementary
- increased points of access along Cazenovia Creek corridor
- revitalize Emery Park. Suffers from lack of maintenance. Support for the
reestablishment of the Emery Inn for some type of small commercial activities
(catering, conferences, restaurant, lodge, etc)
- use of old railroad line in Town for a rails-to-trails project (coordinate
with surrounding communities, County and State)
- accurately assess impact of Knox State Park on village and town. Work to make
sure the park master plan is responsive to demand for local recreational
activities (ball fields, trails, picnic space, etc)
- new residential development should include some provision for increased
recreational demand. Where feasible, land should be provided within the
development for recreational use.
Community Vision: EA Vision Components
- (major features: influences of surrounding towns, more densely development
urban (built-out) nature of village, functioning of area as a center of
regional commerce, Rte 20A (Main St), concentration of public services and
civic/cultural land uses)
- most of village is "village residential" and will experience little or no
change over next 15-20 years.
- area in southeast section (estate/large lot residential): preserve low
density, possibly through new zoning classification or zoning overlay district,
would preserve and limit subdivision activity in area
- uptown business district: protect for historical significance and as gateway
into village, higher standards for redevelopment
- one major industrial area: Fisher Price (protect as important element of
community character)
- two areas of transition:
* office/small business district along railroad corridor south of Uptown
business district. Changing into area of small businesses and offices with lack
of retail spaces. (ex: use of former school building as an office building)
* Commerce Green business park: last vacant land available for light industrial
and office development
* both can be employment centers that bring people to village center
- different Main St areas:
1. Downtown (West End) Suburban Business District: should have design standards
more in line with character of surrounding village because it is a gateway to
the Village. Challenge: keep area in image of village and draw people from area
into other parts of Main St and surrounding community, particularly without
over reliance on motor vehicles
2. Village Commercial Support District: important to keep aesthetics consistent
with character of village, allowing for a visual connection with other areas
along Main St
3. Cultural Center/Business Support District: although it is focused on tourism,
should continue to serve Village community. Connections to surrounding areas,
especially Uptown business district, are crucial. Preserve area as cultural
center of community and capitalize on in this regard
4. Uptown/Traditional Main St Business District: preserve character of area
through appropriate design standards, establish standards with sufficient
public input to ensure the area is designed in a manner that portrays the
desires of the community. Surrounding area also is vital to district for
support to downtown (parking, patrons, complementary support uses). Recognize
and protect the relationship between the two areas.
- investigate a system of on-street trails. Focus on making it easier and more
convenient to move around area w/o car. Trails that link internal features and
components in village as well as Village with adjoining town are vital. In long
run, means of utilizing existing railroad corridor as a multi-purpose trail
should also be considered.
- maintain and establish buffer along Cazenovia Creek for streambank protection,
wildlife habitat and travel, and public access.
Implementation: General Section
- first step is to designate an Advisory Committee as entity(s) responsible for
implementation of document; establish biannual review to determine progress and
continue to review and update plan
- Priority 1 Actions: should be completed first and are anticipated to take
place in first two years after adoption
- Priority 2 Actions: can take place after a particular priority 1 action takes
place or as the community desires in the years 1-5 after plan adoption.
- Priority 3 Actions: either long-term actions (those that may or may not be
necessary depending on future scenarios, or are alternative ideas for certain
priority 1 or 2 actions (that may not achieve desired results). Considered
"Tool Box" actions
EA Implementation
- Priority 1: adopt plan and advisory committee; establish annual budget for
implementation of Regional Comprehensive Plan
* zoning issues: examine business zoning districts for Downtown and
Uptown areas,
specifically the allowable uses to eliminate potential for competition between
these
areas. Examine zoning uses in other areas, to ensure objectives of these areas
can be
achieved;
- amend zoning requirements, where required, to ensure proper setback and bulk
requirements (size/scale) for Main St districts to achieve objectives of Vision
Plan;
- consider allowing residential conversions, by special permit only, in R
(single-
family) Residential zoning district (this would allow for further
diversification of
housing stock and address the issue of legal in-law apartments/need for senior
housing);
- Consider B&B uses, by special use permit, along certain parts of Main St.
that are presently only permitted in R districts
* other codes and regulations: adopt landscaping standards to improve
appearance
and quality of commercial and industrial development and redevelopment in
village.
Standards could be referenced in zoning ordinance or set up as a separate
section of
ordinance;
- adopt architectural review and historic preservation standards to require
developers to design development and redevelopment that is consistent with
character of village;
* cooperative efforts: work closely with Aurora to plan consistently for
border areas
and to ensure that commercial development in Town does not adversely
impact/compete with business districts in Village;
- work with Town to address expansion of light industrial and other uses beyond
Commerce Green and into town;
- continue cooperative planning with State Parks on Knox Park facility
(including Aurora and Elma);
- work cooperatively with NY State Department Of Transportation and County to
properly plan highway improvements to avoid unnecessary street widening and
resulting loss of street trees and roadside vegetation;
- work closely with NY State Department Of Transportation and Aurora to manage
traffic and address problem areas on State highways through area;
- work with State to design access management strategy for Village which
addresses issues of driveway separations and conflicts, turning movements, new
traffic control devices, signal timing, etc and also studies in area of
vicinity of traffic circle;
* other actions: undertake a streetscape project for Main St. continue to
pursue
funding for action;
- in support of tourism and as a means of mitigating traffic impacts associated
with increased tourism, plan for additional and more efficient municipal
parking, particularly in Uptown area of village;
- adapt use of former industrial buildings in business district for commercial
and other appropriate, non-industrial uses;
- study parking needs in Uptown and Downtown areas to development a plan for
addressing current and future needs (could be coupled with larger
transportation study that is recommended)
- Priority 2 (years 3-5): complete comprehensive plan annual report and note
Priority 1 options that have not been completed. Target and reprioritize those
actions. Assess any subdivision and site plan activity that occurred in
previous years to make sure it is compliant with Regional Comprehensive Plan.
Evaluate impact of Priority 1 implementation items that were completed.
Recommend Prior 2 items to be completed in upcoming year; establish annual
budget for Regional Comprehensive Plan
* zoning issues: develop zoning overlay districts for particular use
areas along Main
St to address aesthetic, architecture, landscaping, access, setback,
preservation and
other issues prevalent to the area);
- consider establishing an estate-residential district for southeast portion of
village (to maintain larger lots and homes)
* cooperative efforts: research possible sewer extensions around village,
Begin
dialogue with Town;
- begin discussion with town about companion industrial park development
adjoining Commerce Green (concurrent with sewer extension work);
- regional farmland protection plan should be considered, communities should
evaluate business support issues including tax incentives, financing packages
and economic development grants, plan will ensure farms are treated as
businesses and that they get support like businesses in the community;
- consider regional open space/corridor protection plan;
- form regional tourism committee (help better coordinate actions of legislative
boards);
- complete regional coordination/access management traffic study;
- work with County, State, GBNRTC (MPO) in accommodating pedestrian and bicycle
access;
- explore increased public transportation or creative alternative modes of
transport connections to downtown Buffalo;
- pursue regional wetlands regulations with other communities to regulate non
jurisdictional wetlands no longer regulated by Army Corps of Engineers;
- investigate through joint committee ability to connect regional features
through trail system;
+ all actions require strong board leadership. Once actions to be taken are
determined, assignments can be made to Boards, Committees or groups. Work with
appropriate agencies and/or consultants; work with State and Fed reps to
research possible grant programs for septic system improvements
+ costs to County for implementation of components: unknown
+ costs to Village for consultant: 5K-10K
* other actions: develop community gateways at major entryways into
village;
- continue to research parking in Uptown and Downtown areas;
develop economic strategy for marketing Commerce Green in attempt to expand
light industrial and office uses in EA
+ many of these tasks will require assistance of County and/or consultant
- Priority 3: provide sewer extensions in areas around town to accommodate
denser
development patterns;
- add poor soil condition requirements similar to town of Elma to require
increased lot
sizes in areas of poor "percolation" (lots up to 5 acres);
- greater coordination between businesses and school system to ensure
availability of
local labor pool;
- zoning changes in area of Rte 20A near 400 interchange to accommodate light
industrial/office parks;
- consider reconstructing Rte 400 interchange at Rte 20A (full service access);
- protect railroad corridor from unacceptable uses and lobby to maintain service
corridor commuter usage and possibilities of inter-modal transport;
- work with other communities to develop regional recreational facility such as
pool,
skating rink, etc;
- consider acting with surrounding communities in designating important stream
corridors as Critical Environmental areas (CEAs);
- improve designated road shoulders to accommodate pedestrians and bicycles;
- create and improve points of access along Cazenovia Creek for scenic viewing
and
passive recreation;
- consider usage of abandoned railroad line in southwest portion of Town for
Rails-to-
Trails program;
- pursue joint efforts to address issues that affect regions by pooling
resources, filing
joint grant applications for funding, undertaking mutual studies, establish
joint committees
7.0 - Environmental Review
- EA population growth numbers:
+ population has remained stable between 1990 and 2000. Because village is
primarily "built-out," projections suggest modest if any growth
+ rate of residential construction has been modest. Building permit rates have
averaged about 8 single-family units per year. Apartment dwelling units have
exceeded single-family development; 96 apartment units were permitted between
1990 and 1999, average of 10 per year.
GLOSSARY OF TERMS USED IN REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Aquifier - an underground source of water that lies within or
between water bearing layers of permeable rock, sand or gravel.
Agricultural Preservation - a variety of techniques employed to
help support farming as an economic activity and farmland as a land use.
Central Business District - the area of the Village or a hamlet,
consisting of retail, commercial, institutional and public service
establishments, that functions as the primary location for commerce
Clustered Development - Clustered Development is a design
technique for development projects that concentrates residential buildings in
specific areas on a site to allow the remaining land to be set aside for
recreation, common open space or environmental preservation. This is done by
allowing housing to be constructed on smaller lots as long as the original
density (the number of houses that can be built as-of-right on the property
under the existing zone) does not change.
Conservation Easements - Conservation Easements are a legal means
of controlling development on a particular parcel in order to preserve open
space. Lands subject to Conservation Easements have controls or regulations
limiting development.
Corridor (stream, scenic, open space, habitat) - a connection
linking open space, wildlife habitats or other environmental features.
Greater Buffalo-Niagara Regional Transportation Council (GBNRTC) -
The Greater Buffalo-Niagara Regional Transportation Council is the interagency
planning group that establishes transportation policies and programs for Erie
and Niagara Counties. In 1975, the GBNRTC (which was known as the NFTC -
Niagara Frontier Transportation Committee) was designated the Metropolitan
Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for transportation planning in these
counties. The organization provides a regional decision-making forum for the
development of a multi-modal integrated transportation system that best serves
the Niagara Frontier.
Housing Stock - the overall supply of housing in an area,
including all sizes and styles of residential development.
Hydric Soils - soils are considered to be hydric if they are
saturated, flooded or impounded long enough during the growing season to
develop low oxygen levels and changeable chemical conditions in the upper
layer. These soils are very poorly drained and have a high probability of
containing wetlands.
Infrastructure - the underlying framework of public works systems
that includes sewers, water lines, roadways, drainage piping and other utility
service systems.
Level of Service - this term refers to a measurement of the amount
of automobile traffic on roadways. Level of Service or LOS, as defined in NFTC
2010 Transportation System Plan, is a qualitiative measure describing the
operational conditions within a stream of traffic. It is a means of quantifying
or "grading" the operational quality of service provided by a roadways facility
(NFTC, December 1994). LOS employs a rating system of "A" through "F", with "A"
representing the best conditions with minimal delays and "F" representing
failing conditions with extensive congestion.
Neo-Urbanist Concepts - Neo-urbanist, or neo-traditional, planning
concepts emphasize mixed-use development reminiscent of traditional
"small-town" type development. Traditional grid street patterns are preferred.
Additional design standards typically found in neo-urbanist plans include
smaller building setbacks so that buildings create a street-line, use of public
buildings or parks as focal points in design, and pedestrian-friendly features,
such as sidewalks, crosswalks, benches and street trees.
Overlay District - an overlay district is created by identifying
an area on a municipality's Zoning Map and specifying additional regulations to
supplement the underlying zoning regulations. The underlying zoning of the area
does not change. Rather, additional restrictions are overlain onto the
district. When development is proposed within the boundaries of an overlay
district, the developer must comply with the requirements of the existing
zoning district and the overlay district.
Passive Recreation - passive recreation involves non-strenuous
activities such as picnicking, bird watching, casual walking and scenic
viewing.
Planned Unit Development (PUD) - Planned Unit Developments (PUD)
allow the mixing of commercial, industrial and residential uses on a single
property. Typically zoning does not allow mixing uses, but this technique
allows for a more creative site plan, subject to municipal approval. The usual
use of PUDs is the creation of a planned community, with a proper mix of uses
and layout. If they are allowed within a municipality, the Code specifies the
minimum size of a PUD (acreage), and the requirements that must be followed. It
must be understood that this zoning category is not an "open approval" to all
uses. A plan must be submitted and approved by municipal authorities. A
subcategory of PUDs is the Planned Residential District, or PRD. In this zoning
category only residential uses are allowed, but there is greater leeway in the
mixing of housing types (single-family, duplexes, apartments, condos, etc.).
Subdivision - The division of any parcel of land into two or more
lots for immediate sale or development with or without streets or highways.
Transfer of Development Rights - This is a legal mechanism for
preserving land and open space, by allowing denser development elsewhere within
the municipality. In the areas identified for protection, the "development
rights" can be sold or transferred to a receiving area, where denser
development is appropriate. The area that purchased the development rights is
allowed increased density (more units per acre, for example). In exchange,
development is prohibited in the area selling the development rights.
Wetlands - those areas which are inundated or saturated by surface
or groundwater at a frequency of duration sufficient to support, or that under
normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted
for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands include bogs, swamps, marshes,
cattail ponds, wet forests and meadows. These areas may not be wet or covered
by water throughout the year.
Zoning Districts - In a municipality there exists zoning which
tells you what can be built on the property (the use), and how it shall be
built on the land (bulk requirements including size, height, etc.). Each zoning
district has specific regulations regarding uses and bulk that must be
followed. The zoning districts are identified through a zoning map that depicts
where the boundaries of the zoning district exist.